An Overview of the Page on Wikipedia For Nature
Wikipedia has a great page on Nature, one that is very informative, but it isn’t that much of a surprise. We’ve all seen pictures of wild animals from the wild, and seen a few of the same wild animal in a zoo, but it is an entirely different matter when we come face to face with one in our own backyards. The reason is quite simple: most of these animals do not exist in the wild, they are domesticated or otherwise altered, in order to be used as livestock. The Wikipedia page on Nature makes a lot of sense if we understand that.
It’s also good to know that Wikipedia was formed as a result of the World Wide Web, and the desire to have a common source of information. That has led to many other people, such as myself, coming up with articles, or creating Wikipedia itself.
There are a couple of links on the Wikipedia page for Nature, but it is a bit strange that they are at the very bottom of the page. On the left side of the page there is an image, and it is a rather large picture of a tiger or lion – the tiger in particular. It is rather interesting, since there are some things in the background, such as buildings. The fact that the picture is on the right hand side, and not the left, is a bit odd, because it is rather difficult to get information out of the page itself, which is a huge picture on the left side.
On the Wikipedia page for Nature, there is also a link on the left side, which says “All About”, where you can read more about the subject of Nature. However, it does say “Wikipedia” – which seems strange, as if they are trying to confuse people. This page contains some information about the history of Nature, but not really any information on the actual animals themselves.
The page on Nature actually has a link on its page to another website, called Animals. This site is also pretty useful and has lots of information about the animals that are found in the wild. However, the main page on Animals, which is the link on the Wikipedia page for Nature, is a very short page and is very disjointed, and doesn’t provide much in the way of information.
Another part of the Wikipedia page for Nature, that isn’t really a link, is on the third panel – the top right of the page. It has a picture of a lion in front of a large tree. This is supposed to represent the fact that nature exists in the wild – but there is nothing on the page to support this claim, and the picture itself looks a little silly, because there are no real leaves around.
A link on the second panel on the same page, which is labeled “The World,” gives an explanation about the Wikipedia entry on Nature, which is pretty useful, but is very short and doesn’t give a lot of information about it. There is a list of all the Wikipedia articles about the subject of Nature, but there is no explanation on why these articles are listed, or on what they contain. Other information such as “Articles written about Nature” isn’t given either.
Some of the other categories of articles that are listed on the Wikipedia page for Nature include “Articles written by editors,” and “Articles written by readers,” but the articles themselves aren’t listed. However, that doesn’t mean that they are bad or anything, as long as they are legitimate articles that are up to date, correct, and provide enough information to be useful. One of the main things that the Wikipedia entry on Nature provides is an explanation of how the entries work, and a basic explanation of the articles that are on the page. They give a good overview of the article, and what they mean.
Leave a Reply